Rytr rating history

SaaS (Software as a Service)

Historical rating trends and review volume analysis

Current Rating

4.5
4.5

Total Reviews

2,456

Verified customer feedback

About Rytr

Rytr is an AI writing assistant that helps users generate various forms of content, including emails, blog posts, social media captions, and marketing copy. It offers over 40 content use cases and templates, focusing on speed, efficiency, and producing original, plagiarism-free output. The service is accessible via a web platform and a Chrome Extension, catering to marketers, entrepreneurs, and general users.

🏢 Artificial Intelligence / Content Generation TechnologyAI Writing AssistantContent GeneratorSaaSProductivity ToolCopywriting
📈

Rating & Reviews Trend

📊

Review Velocity

Daily new reviews. Spikes may indicate viral events or potential manipulation.

📋 Rating Snapshots

DateRatingReviewsChange
Jan 04, 2026
4.5
2,456
Jan 03, 2026
4.5
2,456
Jan 02, 2026
4.5
2,456
Jan 01, 2026
4.5
2,456
Dec 31, 2025
4.5
2,456
Dec 30, 2025
4.5
2,456
Dec 29, 2025
4.5
2,456
Dec 28, 2025
4.5
2,456
Dec 27, 2025
4.5
2,456
Dec 26, 2025
4.5
2,456

📊 AI Summary

Rytr receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with an average rating of 4.5/5 from nearly 2500 reviews, highlighting its effectiveness in overcoming writer's block and speeding up content creation. Users frequently praise its ease of use, budget-friendliness, and the natural, non-robotic tone of its output, often comparing it favorably to competitors like ChatGPT. Key use cases mentioned include generating social media posts, emails, academic work, and improving writing for non-native English speakers.

What customers like

  • Produces high-quality, natural-sounding content that doesn't sound robotic, with customizable tone features.
  • Highly user-friendly, budget-friendly, and excellent for overcoming writer's block and speeding up drafting.
  • Versatile with many use cases (emails, social media, articles, academic work) and offers plagiarism-free output.

Main concerns

  • One user noted a low rating (2 stars) but provided no specific negative feedback in the snippet.
  • One user mentioned a 4-star rating, suggesting minor room for improvement, though details were not provided.
  • The free tier has character limits, which might be a constraint for heavy users.

💡 About This Data

Daily Updates

Data is refreshed every 24 hours

AI Analysis

Monthly comparisons powered by GPT-5-nano