Workable rating history
SaaSHistorical rating trends and review volume analysis
Current Rating
Total Reviews
128
Verified customer feedback
About Workable
Workable is an all-in-one HR software platform that provides tools for streamlining recruitment, employee data management, time tracking, and payroll. Its core offerings include an Applicant Tracking System (ATS), candidate sourcing suite, and HR information system features.
Rating & Reviews Trend
Review Velocity
Daily new reviews. Spikes may indicate viral events or potential manipulation.
📋 Rating Snapshots
| Date | Rating | Reviews | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 | |
| Jan 09, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 | |
| Jan 08, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 | |
| Jan 07, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 | |
| Jan 06, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 | |
| Jan 05, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 | |
| Jan 04, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 | |
| Jan 03, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 | |
| Jan 02, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 | |
| Jan 01, 2026 | 3.5 | 128 |
📊 AI Summary
Workable receives mixed reviews, with an overall rating of 2.5/5 based on 112 reviews. Positive feedback highlights its effectiveness as an ATS, customization options, and strong job board syndication capabilities, particularly with LinkedIn and Indeed. However, significant negative sentiment centers on account access issues, high costs, poor customer support experiences, and concerns about data privacy and potential scams.
What customers like
- Great ATS with customizable visual workflows and reporting capabilities.
- Effective job board syndication, posting to 200+ boards, with strong LinkedIn and Indeed partnerships.
- Responsive support team and helpful implementation assistance mentioned by some users.
Main concerns
- Frequent issues with disabled accounts, especially for new businesses, leading to inability to use the service.
- Concerns about high cost and perceived lack of value for the price.
- Reports of slow or poor customer support, bugs, and data privacy concerns regarding LinkedIn applications.
💡 About This Data
Daily Updates
Data is refreshed every 24 hours
AI Analysis
Monthly comparisons powered by GPT-5-nano