Trafft rating history

SaaS

Historical rating trends and review volume analysis

Current Rating

4.3
4.3

Total Reviews

62

Verified customer feedback

About Trafft

Trafft is a comprehensive SaaS platform providing online appointment scheduling and booking software designed to automate various aspects of service-based businesses. It offers features for managing employees, multiple locations, customer data (CRM), payments, and automated reminders via email, SMS, or WhatsApp. The platform is highly customizable and targets a wide range of industries, including beauty salons, coaching, healthcare, and fitness.

🏢 Business Automation & SchedulingAppointment SchedulingBooking SoftwareCRMMulti-location ManagementCustomization
📈

Rating & Reviews Trend

📊

Review Velocity

Daily new reviews. Spikes may indicate viral events or potential manipulation.

📋 Rating Snapshots

DateRatingReviewsChange
Jan 09, 2026
4.3
62
Jan 08, 2026
4.3
62
Jan 07, 2026
4.3
62
Jan 06, 2026
4.3
62
Jan 05, 2026
4.3
62
Jan 04, 2026
4.3
62
Jan 03, 2026
4.3
62
Jan 02, 2026
4.3
62
Jan 01, 2026
4.3
62
Dec 31, 2025
4.3
62

📊 AI Summary

Trafft generally receives high praise for its extensive feature set, high degree of customization, and excellent customer support, often positioning it favorably against competitors like Calendly. While many users find the platform intuitive and robust, particularly for agency use and complex setups, a significant minority report usability issues, especially concerning mobile interface design and specific limitations in managing complex resource/location bookings.

What customers like

  • Highly customizable features allowing users to tailor the platform to specific needs without overpaying for unnecessary features.
  • Outstanding and responsive customer support team that goes above and beyond to assist users.
  • Robust functionality for managing multiple clients/locations, excellent dashboard overview, and strong integration capabilities (e.g., Google Calendar, Outlook, Zoom).
  • Strong value proposition compared to alternatives, offering many features in lower-tier packages.

Main concerns

  • Significant usability issues reported, particularly with the mobile calendar being inefficient and difficult to navigate.
  • Frustration over core functionality limitations, such as booking conflicts when managing multiple locations/resources simultaneously.
  • Perception that the development roadmap prioritizes developer ease over critical user workflow improvements, with some requested features taking years to implement or being dismissed.

💡 About This Data

Daily Updates

Data is refreshed every 24 hours

AI Analysis

Monthly comparisons powered by GPT-5-nano