VINSeeker rating history
Historical rating trends and review volume analysis
Current Rating
4.0
4.0
Total Reviews
24,360
Verified customer feedback
📈
Rating & Reviews Trend
📊
Review Velocity
Daily new reviews. Spikes may indicate viral events or potential manipulation.
📋 Rating Snapshots
| Date | Rating | Reviews | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 09, 2026 | 4.0 | 24,360 | |
| Jan 08, 2026 | 4.0 | 24,360 | |
| Jan 06, 2026 | 4.0 | 24,360 | |
| Jan 05, 2026 | 4.0 | 24,360 | |
| Jan 04, 2026 | 4.0 | 24,360 | |
| Jan 03, 2026 | 4.0 | 24,360 | |
| Jan 02, 2026 | 4.0 | 24,360 | |
| Jan 01, 2026 | 4.0 | 24,360 | |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 4.0 | 24,360 | |
| Dec 30, 2025 | 4.0 | 24,360 |
📊 AI Summary
VINSeeker maintains a strong overall rating, driven primarily by positive feedback regarding the speed and accuracy of their VIN decoding services. However, a notable minority of recent reviews highlight recurring issues with customer support responsiveness and occasional data discrepancies in the reports.
What customers like
- Users frequently praise the 'lightning-fast' report generation and the 'detailed accuracy' of the vehicle history data provided.
- Several reviews mention that the platform is 'incredibly easy to use' compared to competitors.
- Positive feedback specifically calls out the value for money when purchasing comprehensive reports.
Main concerns
- Multiple recent 1-star reviews cite 'unacceptable wait times' for email support responses when issues arise.
- A recurring complaint involves 'missing or outdated registration details' in some reports, leading to frustration.
- Some users experienced difficulty navigating the mobile interface, describing it as 'clunky' on smaller screens.
Key Themes
Report Accuracy and SpeedCustomer Service ResponsivenessPlatform Usability
💡 About This Data
Daily Updates
Data is refreshed every 24 hours
AI Analysis
Monthly comparisons powered by GPT-5-nano