Rosetta Stone rating history
Historical rating trends and review volume analysis
Current Rating
2.3
2.3
Total Reviews
6,950
Verified customer feedback
Recent Change
+0.10 rating
📈
Rating & Reviews Trend
📊
Review Velocity
Daily new reviews. Spikes may indicate viral events or potential manipulation.
📋 Rating Snapshots
| Date | Rating | Reviews | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 09, 2026 | 2.3 | 6,950 | ↑+0.10 |
| Jan 08, 2026 | 2.2 | 6,950 | |
| Jan 07, 2026 | 2.2 | 6,950 | |
| Jan 06, 2026 | 2.2 | 6,950 | |
| Jan 05, 2026 | 2.2 | 6,950(+1) | |
| Jan 04, 2026 | 2.2 | 6,949 | |
| Jan 03, 2026 | 2.2 | 6,949 | |
| Jan 02, 2026 | 2.2 | 6,949 | |
| Jan 01, 2026 | 2.2 | 6,949 | |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 2.2 | 6,949 |
📊 AI Summary
Rosetta Stone maintains a generally positive reputation based on the high volume of 5-star reviews, though recent feedback indicates significant frustration regarding subscription models and perceived lack of progress after initial excitement. Key issues revolve around the cost structure and the effectiveness of the learning methodology over the long term.
What customers like
- Initial setup and user interface are often praised as intuitive and easy to start with.
- Users appreciate the immersive nature of the early lessons and the focus on visual learning.
- Some long-term users report achieving conversational fluency in specific languages.
Main concerns
- Significant complaints about the mandatory subscription renewal structure and difficulty canceling services.
- Several reviews mention that the program becomes repetitive or stalls in effectiveness after the beginner/intermediate stages.
- Frustration over the cost relative to the perceived depth of advanced language instruction.
Key Themes
Subscription/Billing IssuesLong-term Learning EfficacyUser Interface/Onboarding Experience
💡 About This Data
Daily Updates
Data is refreshed every 24 hours
AI Analysis
Monthly comparisons powered by GPT-5-nano