Peerberry
trustpilot•Rating History
Current Rating
3.9
3.9
Total Reviews
264
Customer feedback
📈
Rating Trend
📋 Rating Snapshots
| Date | Rating | Reviews | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2025 | 3.9 | 264 | |
| Nov 12, 2025 | 3.9 | 264 | |
| Nov 02, 2025 | 3.9 | 263 | |
| Nov 02, 2025 | 3.9 | 263 |
📊 Summary
Overall, PeerBerry reviews are mixed but skew positive, with strong praise for responsive customer service and successful handling of war-affected loans, while concerns remain about liquidity, returns after cash drag, and occasional technical issues.
What customers like:
- Efficient and professional customer service; for example, a Sunday chat resolved issues quickly.
- Excellent support team cited by users (e.g., Inga and Rita) who are 'always there to help'.
- Platform has delivered observed returns around 9-10% annually and users report quick investing and withdrawing.
- Loans affected by the war were repaid, reinforcing trust in PeerBerry's handling of difficult events.
- Investing platform described as stable with clear communication and useful investor resources (e.g., Telegram groups).
Main concerns:
- Presence of a 'click war' with bots at 7am over 8-9% loans and lack of a secondary market, causing liquidity concerns.
- No secondary market means money can be stuck for a long time, according to reviewers.
- Internal server errors and slow app performance, including phrases like 'Internal server error' and 'App lentissima... problemi tecnici'.
- Discrepancy between advertised returns (9-10%) and perceived actual returns (~6-7%) due to cash drag.
- Some users report pay process issues and even claims of fraud in individual reviews.
Key Themes:
Customer support qualityWar impact on loan repayment and risk managementLiquidity and absence of secondary marketTechnical reliability and platform performanceReturn expectations vs reality (cash drag)
Get Alerts
Subscribe to receive email alerts when Peerberry's rating changes significantly.
💡 About This Data
Daily Updates
Data is refreshed every 24 hours
AI Analysis
Monthly comparisons powered by GPT-5-nano