ecoATM rating history
Historical rating trends and review volume analysis
Current Rating
3.6
3.6
Total Reviews
21,156
Verified customer feedback
Recent Change
+9new reviews
📈
Rating & Reviews Trend
📊
Review Velocity
Daily new reviews. Spikes may indicate viral events or potential manipulation.
📋 Rating Snapshots
| Date | Rating | Reviews | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 09, 2026 | 3.6 | 21,156(+9) | |
| Jan 08, 2026 | 3.6 | 21,147(+9) | |
| Jan 07, 2026 | 3.6 | 21,138(+7) | |
| Jan 06, 2026 | 3.6 | 21,131(+7) | |
| Jan 05, 2026 | 3.6 | 21,124(+9) | |
| Jan 04, 2026 | 3.6 | 21,115(+8) | |
| Jan 03, 2026 | 3.6 | 21,107(+4) | |
| Jan 02, 2026 | 3.6 | 21,103(+10) | |
| Jan 01, 2026 | 3.6 | 21,093(+11) | |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 3.6 | 21,082 |
📊 AI Summary
Customer sentiment for ecoATM appears largely positive, driven by high ratings, though recent reviews suggest some recurring issues related to the device experience and payout accuracy. Positive feedback frequently praises the convenience and speed of the process, while negative comments often center on technical malfunctions or discrepancies in the quoted vs. received cash amounts.
What customers like
- The process is described as quick and convenient for recycling old devices.
- Many users appreciate the immediate cash payout offered by the kiosks.
- Several reviews mention the ease of use of the ecoATM interface.
Main concerns
- Multiple recent reviews cite issues where the machine either rejected the phone or offered a significantly lower price than the initial online quote.
- Complaints about the machine malfunctioning or freezing during the transaction process.
- Frustration over the quoted price not matching the final offer received at the kiosk.
Key Themes
Payout Accuracy/Quoting DiscrepanciesKiosk Functionality and ReliabilityConvenience of Immediate Recycling
💡 About This Data
Daily Updates
Data is refreshed every 24 hours
AI Analysis
Monthly comparisons powered by GPT-5-nano